Credit concerns, permit backlog, and operational controversy place the Afrikaans-focused e‑hailing service under pressure.
 |
| 📷 Wanatu’s fleet, once marketed as a culturally specific e-hailing service, now faces liquidation amid mounting debt. |
The South African e-hailing company Wanatu has made headlines after several of its vehicles were reportedly auctioned to recover debts totaling over R13 million. While the financial distress alone warrants scrutiny, public discourse surrounding the company has highlighted deeper concerns namely, the intersection of business ethics, legal compliance, and reputational risk.
The company, launched in late 2024, positioned itself as a culturally tailored e-hailing alternative, offering services primarily in Afrikaans. However, what began as a niche business model quickly drew controversy for allegedly exclusionary practices. Now, amid asset liquidation and mounting legal pressure, Wanatu finds itself at the center of a national conversation about whether values like inclusivity are not only moral imperatives but commercial ones as well.
A Business Model Under Fire
Wanatu’s strategy was to provide e-hailing services where drivers could communicate fluently in Afrikaans, catering primarily to Afrikaans-speaking communities in areas such as Pretoria and Centurion. According to early reports, the company required drivers to speak Afrikaans a policy that drew widespread criticism from civil society and government stakeholders.
Legal experts and political commentators argued the requirement violated South Africa’s constitutional principles of equality and non-discrimination. The City of Tshwane’s Roads and Transport MMC, for example, labeled the policy "blatant racism." The South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) subsequently launched an investigation into Wanatu's hiring policies.
Although the company claimed its aim was to meet a cultural and linguistic market demand, the approach was viewed by many as a form of linguistic gatekeeping that effectively excluded non-Afrikaans-speaking job seekers raising critical questions about the limits of niche targeting in a diverse society.
Legal and Regulatory Setbacks
The business also ran into operational challenges. In early 2025, several of Wanatu’s vehicles were impounded by the Tshwane Metro Police Department for operating without the required municipal permits. Though the company argued that this enforcement was selective and politically motivated especially as many e-hailing operators across Gauteng face a chronic backlog in permit processing it nonetheless led to a temporary suspension of services.
Wanatu joined a coalition of e-hailing providers, including Uber and Bolt, in securing an urgent court interdict to halt further vehicle impoundments. While the court action represented a short-term legal reprieve, it did little to stabilize Wanatu’s financial footing.
The most recent development a confirmed auction of company vehicles signals deeper liquidity issues. Reports suggest that these auctions aim to recoup over R13 million in outstanding debt, raising serious doubts about the company’s sustainability moving forward.
Public Sentiment and Brand Perception
Social media reaction has been swift and pointed. One widely shared comment stated: “Bad business model. Racism is not good business!” While anecdotal, this sentiment captures a growing public consensus: in a country where race and language remain politically sensitive, exclusionary business practices perceived or real may carry reputational costs that outweigh any niche market gains.
From a branding perspective, the company’s alignment with exclusivity became a liability rather than a differentiator. Stakeholders from regulators to consumers expect businesses to reflect South Africa’s broader values of inclusion and equity. Wanatu’s apparent failure to do so may have undermined both its public trust and investor confidence.
Lessons for South African Enterprises
The Wanatu case offers a timely and important lesson: ethical misalignment can have material consequences. In South Africa’s socio-political landscape, the separation between legal compliance, brand integrity, and commercial viability is increasingly narrow.
Businesses must navigate not only market forces but also public expectations grounded in the country’s constitutional ethos. Operating in a multicultural society demands more than operational efficiency it requires cultural intelligence, ethical foresight, and an unwavering commitment to inclusive practices.
While the full story of Wanatu is still unfolding, the core issues are already clear. What began as an attempt to serve a specific linguistic community evolved into a legal and reputational crisis that now threatens the company’s very existence.
For entrepreneurs and executives alike, Wanatu’s experience serves as a cautionary tale: exclusion may generate short-term attention, but in South Africa, it rarely translates into long-term viability. Ethics and enterprise are no longer parallel paths they are fundamentally intertwined.
0 Comments